![endnote with reference style of j. nat. prod endnote with reference style of j. nat. prod](https://ajmc.s3.amazonaws.com/_media/_issue/AJMC_04_2020_01FM_Cover.jpg)
- Endnote with reference style of j. nat. prod full#
- Endnote with reference style of j. nat. prod software#
Thus, an author’s decision to use, or not use, this software may impact on the accurate reporting of the number of studies reviewed for inclusion and exclusion in a systematic review. In the context of systematic reviews, reference management programs facilitate the capture and organization of studies identified through electronic database searching, the identification and elimination of duplicate records from multiple database searches, the transfer of references to Cochrane RevMan and other systematic reviews software, and the accurate citing of references within manuscripts. Many guides to undertaking systematic reviews, including the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, recommend reference management software as a means of assisting in the organization and selection of component studies for inclusion in these reviews. To this end, a “rigorous data management plan” is essential. The identification, collection, and organization of relevant studies are instrumental to the successful completion of systematic reviews.
![endnote with reference style of j. nat. prod endnote with reference style of j. nat. prod](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/LQD7lgazOAk/maxresdefault.jpg)
Web-based programs also provide users with enhanced networking functions that readily support the sharing of records among researchers. That said, the benefits of these web-based programs include the ability to store reference databases on secure servers, and access databases from multiple computers or other electronic devices. Single-station software usage is generally not affected by website time-lags, down times, or record limits, all of which may impinge on the usability of web-based products. While some, such as EndNote and Reference Manager, run on single-station computers, many others, including RefWorks, Mendeley and Zotero, are web-based. Products such as EndNote, Papers, and RefWorks are licensed or sold outright, while others (e.g.: Mendeley and Zotero), are available at little or no cost to the user. Although all programs facilitate the capture, organization, and elimination of duplicate records from electronic database searching, they vary with respect to cost, overall functionality, and networking capabilities. Numerous reference management programs are currently available. As electronic databases, such as MEDLINE, became generally accessible and more easily searchable, researchers began to use this software to maintain databases of all research relevant to their fields of interest. First developed in the 1980s, these programs were initially marketed to researchers as a means of creating online indexes of personal print-article collections. Reference management software, also known as bibliographic software, citation management software, or personal bibliographic file managers is “any software product used for storage and retrieval of bibliographic records”. Reference management software programs, including EndNote, RefWorks and Zotero, are one such tool. These tools range from statistical software to comprehensive systematic reviews programs, such as the Cochrane Collaboration’s Review Manager (RevMan) software. Various software programs have been adopted by, and specifically developed for, authors of systematic reviews. The transparency, reproducibility and quality of systematic reviews may be enhanced through increased reporting of reference management software usage. Conclusionsĭespite underreporting of use, reference management software is frequently adopted by authors of systematic reviews. Comments with respect to ease-of-use issues focused on the integration of this software with other programs and computer interfaces, and the sharing of reference databases among researchers. EndNote, Reference Manager, and RefWorks were the programs of choice for more than 98% of authors who used this software.
![endnote with reference style of j. nat. prod endnote with reference style of j. nat. prod](https://s3.amazonaws.com/libapps/accounts/53148/images/en_x8_groups.png)
Of these, 4.8% reported this usage in their published studies. Of the 78 researchers who responded to our survey, 79.5% reported that they had used a reference management software package to prepare their review. We surveyed corresponding authors to verify and supplement information in published reports, and gather frequency and ease-of-use data on individual reference management programs.
Endnote with reference style of j. nat. prod full#
We reviewed the full text of systematic reviews published in core clinical journals indexed in ACP Journal Club from 2008 to November 2011 to determine the extent to which reference management software usage is reported in published reviews. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which authors are using reference management software to produce systematic reviews identify which programs are used most frequently and rate their ease of use and assess the degree to which software usage is documented in published studies. Reference management software programs enable researchers to more easily organize and manage large volumes of references typically identified during the production of systematic reviews.