People can clean and they can clean, but I bet if I planned a murder for 6 months that I just would not get away with it. Do you really think these two morons could stab, shoot, rape, cut a throat and not leave anything behind in that trailer or garage, or creeper, or yard or anywhere. I don’t say this to be judgmental or mean, but it is just true. These people and that junk yard was filthy, I’m sorry. You all give these two moron’s too much credit. He could have had 50 local girls once he got his settlement. Didn’t Steven Avery have about 34 million reasons not to disrupt his lawsuit to kill a local girl. I also just want to add food for thought. There was no way in hell that kid could have ever have gotten a fair trial. I must say on the face of it, guilty or innocent, that is in itself despicable. Do you also know that despite this, the judge let these confessions be entered as evidence and for the jury to see and hear. Don’t be conned into give up intellectual honesty merely because a biased television show tugged at your emotions.ĭo any of you know that Brandon Dassey’s first public defender was actually removed from Brandon’s case and on top of that disbarred and removed from ever receiving any files from the state of the public defenders office because he agreed to let Brandon be interviewed by these detectives without the presence of an attorney which was totally unethical and in no way in Brendon’s best interest. There is no reasonable doubt against the weight of the evidence.
Serial killer confession transcript trial#
Inquisitive people would read the trial transcripts and review what the evidence actually was, not just what was shown on the show, and would certainly come to the conclusion that they did it.Īvery and Dassey did it. Reasonable people would satisfy their intellectual curiosity, as well as exercise their rational thinking abilities, and not make a judgment based on a documentary that pushed an agenda. Watching the documentary leads a reasonable person to think one of two things: they either did it, or there was a serious coverup.
It is that fragment that could not be linked to Avery’s gun. Also, they did recover Teresa’s DNA from a bullet fragment. They absolutely proved that the bullet could only have come from Steven’s gun. To Anonymous March 1: You really need to read the transcripts, and review the evidence. and poor Brendan thinks they’re on about cutting her hair! And it wasn’t that they weren’t able to find any evidence linking anyone else, it was that they weren’t allowed to. They keep on and on until they get the response they are looking for, just look at the bit about the head. Also, the times change multiple times and a large amount of it is not possibly true for example his mum saw him at home. Who knows what was said to Brendan while the tapes aren’t recording? You can clearly read he’s making a large amount of it up. They could not prove without doubt the bullet came from his gun either, and his brother in law was spotted trying to sell the same make gun a few days after… Reading the first interview as someone else has mentioned shows gaps and responses missing. Also, there is just so many flaws in each piece of evidence. Perhaps if they had interviewed others, or looked into any one else (Bobby Dassey, the ex boyfriend for example) they would have found other evidence pointing to someone else. Also check out my true crime books here, which are available in paperback, audiobook, and eBook formats.Īll the evidence appears to point to Avery because that was the only line of investigation they ever made. 5/13/15 – Recorded phone call between Brendan and his motherįollow me on Twitter and on Facebook.5/13/06 – Fassbender/Wiegert question Brendan again.5/12/05 – Email from Kachinsky to Fassbender.